kiya: (fuzzy gears)
( Nov. 15th, 2003 03:57 am)
Section 52: 703 words. Done.
Section 53: 490 words. Not done.

Total for the day: 1193 words.
Total for the month: 9073 words.
Average daily wordcount: 648 words (and change).
Current hypothetical November duration: 77 days, 3 hours, 14 minutes, 22.79 seconds.
Rate differential: 2.57116.
Pointless mathematical fidgeting: at 100%.

Going to bed now in the hopes of rendering the sleep schedule slightly less horked.
kiya: (writing)
( Jul. 13th, 2003 11:31 pm)
Either I'm too bloody brainscrambled to navigate (spelt 'mavigate' originally, which I suppose would be typing the search entry in the wrong browser) the OED at the moment, or it doesn't have the word I'm looking for at all. (I wanted to confirm it existed. [livejournal.com profile] teinedreugan says I have it right, at least.)

C'mon, people. They're pells. Pells! One hits them.

I can forgive www.dictionary.com and the online Merriam-Webster for not having them, as I suspect most people aren't looking up whatsis jousting terminology these days, but the OED? I hope it's just that I'm inept. ([livejournal.com profile] brooksmoses, are you ept? It's your fetish, after all.)

Definitely mentally fried today, but also so far over 1700 words. Waiting on comments on some of it from [livejournal.com profile] annwyd, who is also fried.

I'll have mine over light.
One of my normally quiescent mailing lists has been fairly chatty of late, with people who keep saying daft things that I feel an urge to poke holes in with a sharp stick.

One of the things that provoked a breaking out of the sharp stick was someone who was basically arguing in favor of subvert-the-dominant-paradigm lifestyle polyamory and ragging on people who don't do enough to undo social conditioning or what have you.

As I said to the gang: It occurs to me that by denying the necessity of iconoclasm in a fringe subculture, I'm being a terrifically perverse stereotypical Aquarius. (Unpacked slightly: The fashion is iconoclasm, so I won't.)

Though to continue with the astrology, a bit of backhanded perversity is probably in the books, given that my ascendant is Scorpio.
That when I saw a spam that began "MEN: . . ." I immediately scanned to the end of the subject line looking for the clause that began "DE:".

I have no earthly idea what that something is, just now, but I'm sure it says something. Possibly something in Greek.

See also explosive booze. )

I think that settles the question of whether or not it's producing bubbles.

In other news, I walk funny when I have a hand-sized patch of muscles around my hip that's locked solid. At least it's not a joint misalignment.
I went thrashing about for something to read and started in on the potions book I ordered before I went to visit [livejournal.com profile] brooksmoses; it made a stray mention of moringa oil in the context of scents.

Scents good. So I go to look up moringa oil, to see what it is, and if it's available anywhere I can get it so I can learn what it smells like for myself.

It's amazing stuff (just to pick one of the articles I found). Fastest-growing tree known, native to India (and Africa), lots of its parts are edible, it can purify water, its oil has even more nutritious stuff in than olive oil and burns clean, it has antibacterial properties, it apparently can help with controlling diabetes, the flowers are edible (calcium and potassium), are used for tea for colds, and last most of the year for bees, its root can be turned into a condiment like horseradish (and one species has a starchy, edible root), it's successful in combating malnutrition in Senegal, the dried leaves are ground to a powder that's an effective dietary supplement . . . .

Oh, and the wood can be used to produce a blue dye. In case there was a need for anything else.

No, [livejournal.com profile] teinedreugan, I won't ask for one. I don't think we can get a tall enough greenhouse. ;)
kiya: (bangles)
( Jan. 13th, 2003 06:15 pm)
. . . could you give me the cites on the much-discussed verb involving Judas and handing over, and possibly the verb itself again? I've forgotten exactly where it is, and [livejournal.com profile] lstone was asking about, and I'm thinking you probably have it handy, if not in memory . . .
kiya: (buddha)
( Dec. 5th, 2002 02:29 am)
When I rub the cats in the dark, not only do I get flickerings of sparks before my hand, but afterwards sparkles in their fur.

Humidity? What humidity?
. . . it may be me.

I just saw an ad for non-acidic Vitamin C.
[livejournal.com profile] teinedreugan put in SWII earlier today while I was moomphing about.

And, in observing, I have come to a conclusion.

Anakin is a Cherub, from In Nomine.

Supporting geekery, cut for length and spoilers. )

This amused me. So I put it here where it might amuse others. :}
Okay, so I'm being silly in between being sick. But it occurred to me in watching something or other that clearly what had happened was that someone was jumped by a surprise elemental.

Therefore. . .
Elemental of Surprise, D&D3 writeup )
The skin cream I get because I'm married includes, in its little insert, a chemical diagram of its prime active ingredient.

This tickles me.
Someone made a snippy comment of, "I'm a Kinsey three," on rasseff.

One person responded with, "A little further and you'd be a Kinsey pi."

This provoked further rambling, including the idea of a Kinsey i.

I think I may be a Kinsey 1 + 4.5 i. (On the 1-6 scale; on the 0-6 scale just 4.5 i.)

I have a strange urge to get this on a t-shirt before next Pride.
This can be blamed a little on a conversation on alt.poly in which the moral failings of Young Earth Creationists are being flogged at extreme length, and partly due to some unrelated frustrations, and probably partly having to do with having read To Reign in Hell recently, to make further reference to the massive Brust-reading extravaganza.

I think part of the problem with creation myths comes when people take allegory literally. Myths is myths, pigs is pigs. And then there are places where the allegory just runs just plain wrong. (The peeve here is the idea that one sex/gender/whatever preceded the other, or is drawn from the other, or something of the sort.)

Ramblings on the subject continued )
A while back I made an offhanded comment about having the system of axes I feel adequate to describe sexual orientation requiring eight; I was wrong, it seems to be, after some discussion with Kevin, nine. Either way, I run out of dimensions and start to tesser.

This is still tidier than my set of political axes, which was up well over a dozen last time I looked at it, but I'm not sure where I put my notes. Might even be a text file. One of these days I'm going to learn enough cgi and such to write up one of those stupid "Where do you fit on the political spectrum?" things, only I'll use my spectrum. Getting the results printed out will be a bear.

The thing with orientation systems, I think, that's a major problem, is that there are generally very few options for N/A. (Like the objection to the word "bisexual" on the basis of "more than two sexes available".) I don't think it's possible to assemble a system that deals with all of these sorts of objections, though.


I'm not entirely sure what brought this thing to mind, but I'm going to ramble about it anyway rather than doing play-by-play on two games in a row. (Besides, it's not Pedro pitching, so.)


Anyway. My so-called system, with noodling. )

.

Profile

kiya: (Default)
kiya

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags