People who don't read alt.poly will probably not have the context for this in its entirety. Short version of the context: the person who emailed me is someone I consider hostile to women, to women like me in particular, and who joined alt.poly under the presumption that the women there would be easy and thus do him.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney eyes her email. Oh look, Orlando emailed me.
Brooks pages: Email? Well, I suppose that's one way aroung the killfile. What about, dare I ask?
You paged Brooks with 'He wanted to know how my comment about having a penetration fetish differed from enjoying normal sex.'.
Brooks pages: Ah. Well, an explanation of _that_ ought be good for wankoff material, eh?
You paged Brooks with 'Indeed. I am disinclined to respond.'.
You paged Brooks with 'He seems to have forgotten I'm one of the monsters who does d/s.'.
Brooks pages: Yeah. --Heh.
You paged Brooks with 'Which, given my evening, fills me with warm, fuzzy irony.'.
Brooks pages: Though, actually, an explanation of that could very easily avoid being such, unless "I like sex, I'm female, and I'm emailing you about it" counts for him, which on reflection I suppose it does. I mean, one cites the standard definition ("is essentially required for full enjoyment of sex"), observes that the application is obvious, and that this is not true for a number of people. It is a regret that there is nobody useful to send the explanation _to_.
You paged Brooks with 'Indeed.'.
You paged Brooks with 'I may post to LJ about it instead. ;)'.
Brooks pages: And that he posted it in a venue where someone else can't answer it. --Is one thing to do with it, I suppose. If it actually wants explanation to the people who read your LJ and are on the relevant filters. I suppose there are interesting questions somewhat near to the one he asked.
You paged Brooks with 'I was thinking of just making a public post about it, as it's not, y'know, the sort of stuff that goes on the sex/kink filter. Which has very few people on it who would understand the context that is Orlando.'.
Brooks pages: Heh.
You paged Brooks with 'What's hehable about that? ;}'.
Brooks pages: Orlando, intrinsically.
You paged Brooks with 'Oh, indeed. May I quote this conversation at LJ? :}'.
Brooks pages: Yes.
You paged Brooks with 'Makes the whole thing easier.'.
Brooks pages: Indeed.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney spends some time pondering appropriate userpictures.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney goes for 'watcher'.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney eyes her email. Oh look, Orlando emailed me.
Brooks pages: Email? Well, I suppose that's one way aroung the killfile. What about, dare I ask?
You paged Brooks with 'He wanted to know how my comment about having a penetration fetish differed from enjoying normal sex.'.
Brooks pages: Ah. Well, an explanation of _that_ ought be good for wankoff material, eh?
You paged Brooks with 'Indeed. I am disinclined to respond.'.
You paged Brooks with 'He seems to have forgotten I'm one of the monsters who does d/s.'.
Brooks pages: Yeah. --Heh.
You paged Brooks with 'Which, given my evening, fills me with warm, fuzzy irony.'.
Brooks pages: Though, actually, an explanation of that could very easily avoid being such, unless "I like sex, I'm female, and I'm emailing you about it" counts for him, which on reflection I suppose it does. I mean, one cites the standard definition ("is essentially required for full enjoyment of sex"), observes that the application is obvious, and that this is not true for a number of people. It is a regret that there is nobody useful to send the explanation _to_.
You paged Brooks with 'Indeed.'.
You paged Brooks with 'I may post to LJ about it instead. ;)'.
Brooks pages: And that he posted it in a venue where someone else can't answer it. --Is one thing to do with it, I suppose. If it actually wants explanation to the people who read your LJ and are on the relevant filters. I suppose there are interesting questions somewhat near to the one he asked.
You paged Brooks with 'I was thinking of just making a public post about it, as it's not, y'know, the sort of stuff that goes on the sex/kink filter. Which has very few people on it who would understand the context that is Orlando.'.
Brooks pages: Heh.
You paged Brooks with 'What's hehable about that? ;}'.
Brooks pages: Orlando, intrinsically.
You paged Brooks with 'Oh, indeed. May I quote this conversation at LJ? :}'.
Brooks pages: Yes.
You paged Brooks with 'Makes the whole thing easier.'.
Brooks pages: Indeed.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney spends some time pondering appropriate userpictures.
Long distance to Brooks: Whitney goes for 'watcher'.
From:
no subject
Am I the only woman who's ever posted to alt.poly _never_ to be e-mailed by that idiot?
From:
no subject