This from the most recent spam phone call I've gotten (I'm answering the phone today because Kevin placed an order and they might be calling here).
This is the normal thing. Normally in follow-up to this, they ask me, "Are you Mrs. Marsh?" and I say "No." This time they asked the question that I answer "Yes" to:
Then it gets interesting.
Graceful recovery, that.
Then she hung up on me.
Hello?
Can I speak to Kevin Marsh?
I'm afraid he's at work.
This is the normal thing. Normally in follow-up to this, they ask me, "Are you Mrs. Marsh?" and I say "No." This time they asked the question that I answer "Yes" to:
Is this his wife?
Yes.
Then it gets interesting.
Mrs. Marsh, I. . .
My name is not Mrs. Marsh.
Huh?
Graceful recovery, that.
I did not take my husband's name.
*with amazing huffiness* Oh-kay. Sorrreeeeee.
Then she hung up on me.
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
A.
who has always been proud of her mom for having a hyphenated last name; where she was from, and thirty years ago, that was very feminist of her.
From:
no subject
From:
A better response
Sometimes it really throws callers for a loop.
Why play into the assumption that if someone in the couple took on the other's name, it had to be the wife who changed...
From:
no subject
From:
*chuckle*
/I/ was asked if I were Mr. Marsh's wife.
*grins, remembering*
From:
Re: A better response
I don't know if that works better for me because I'm male, at home all day, and Lis's name is on all the phonespam lists. It may be that "actually, not 'Mrs Marsh'; my husband didn't take my last name when we got married" is just plain less effective than, "actually, not 'Mr Riba'; I didn't take my wife's name when we got married."
I dunno. I like to think that, the way I say it, it makes people wonder why they assume that couples do have the last name, and, if so, why it should be the husbands'.
"May I speak to Elisabeth Riba?"
"I'm sorry, she's not available."
"Is there a Mr. Riba?"
"There's nobody at this address by that name."
I never deny being her husband -- unless I feel like it. I mean, I don't feel like I'm required to actually be honest with total strangers who phone me up to sell me stuff.
From:
Re: A better response
Someone who points out that he didn't take his wife's name is doing something incongruous that shows up the silliness of the presumption of name-changing. Someone who points out that she didn't take her husband's name is a ball-breaking feminazi bitch who should know better than to be annoyed by being referred to by a name not her own because she should know that's the normal thing to do, the freak.
At least I presume that's why she got huffy about being gently corrected.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
So, um, yeah. If I do get married, I'm keeping my surname.
From:
no subject
"Is Mr. Emrick there?"
"No."
"Are you Mrs. Emrick?"
"He's not married."
Silence...
Highly entertaining. Now, if I don't want to talk with people, I just tell them I'm not there. Works fairly well, but sometimes I do that to my credit card company which is annoying.
From:
no subject
My title of record with financial institutions is "Dr.", on the grounds that when I asked for this to be changed on my credit cards after acquiring my PhD, my credit limit was unexpectedly raised by almost a third. This provides a reasonable excuse for not answering to any other title to phone marketers.
From:
no subject
*blink* I will have to tell Chad this. Actually, his credit limits don't really need to be raised. But still.