Doing reading about chaos magic now, on and off, which is being interesting. I read this description of magical models; the first three models I responded to with, "Yes, I've used that one when it seemed to be the most appropriate," the fourth with, "Hm. That could be useful, I'll stash it somewhere and see what happens," and the fifth with, "Heh. That hardly needs iterating, does it?"

Reading about the whole thing leaves me wondering a bit; it reminds me of the time I was shuffling Tarot one lazy day in English class (it was May, and the day of the French IB exam or something so there were five people in class and we were doing nothing much), and someone near me asked me what it was. I told her, and got the response, "You don't . . . believe in that stuff, do you? I mean, you're Science Girl." I said, "I believe in what works." Which is similar but not identical to what I'm picking up about what Chaotes do, as far as I can tell.

Section 67: 847. 1112 total. Done. (Yes, that is less than you'd expect from yesterday's total; I deleted a paragraph.)
Section 68: 363. Done.
1210 total. Which seems to irritate [livejournal.com profile] oneironaut for some reason.

That means that my None-o total comes to: 22,543 words. Respectable, that.

(Randomthought: Hm. That's something else I need an icon for. Make a mental note, I do. Geekery icon will do. (Vast, pathetic vistas of self-expression.))
.

Profile

kiya: (Default)
kiya

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags