graydon: (Default)

From: [personal profile] graydon


A nano is getting 50 kwords (40 kwords? I think it's a parameter these days...) of writing done.

It specifically doesn't have to be finished or salable or quite what you expected.

So Hurrah, you did a nano!
graydon: (Default)

From: [personal profile] graydon


Coalescing patterns in the text, hurrah!

I have got all kinds of feelings about long these days, because I have found out that readers purely don't notice -- The March North is forty-four percent the length of A Succession of Bad Days; readers notice "longer", but they don't notice "more than twice" -- and I have also found out that edits don't scale linearly at all. It's not even that "twice as long is four times the work" (though it might be); it's that the length and the editing effort don't match.

And the cost is linear, for the edits; that both seems unfair (to all involved, but particularly the editor) and like a reason to write shorter books. Though it doesn't seem to get into the writing process at all; the next one is short (86 kwords) but the one after that is going to be a brick. (Six expected parts. First draft -- and they always get longer! -- of one part is 42 kwords. Simple extrapolation says eep!)
graydon: (Default)

From: [personal profile] graydon


If it works, it works.

I have to put time and effort into defining process at work; for writing, I figure I can just notice things do or don't work and act accordingly.
.

Profile

kiya: (Default)
kiya

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags