Stock Rants #2: "Polyamory" and word origins.

[kiya]

I was going to write up a bunch of these so I could just reference them later, and then I got distracted by a shiny object and just did the one. And then I was reminded last night, and this is the one that came out last night, so I am storing it.


Okay. I know that you think the "Polyamory is wrong! It should be 'multiamory' or 'polyphilia'! Mixing roots is wrong!" is cute. So here's the deal: you can think it's cute, so long as you turn in your ipsomobile license and accept having your teleopticon privileges revoked.

And maybe it's not "everything associated with a minority group has to go through an extra layer of justification" in its background, and I really need to grow a sense of humor or something (see userpicture), but frankly, the idea that suddenly my bastard whoreson of a language needs to practice stringent root purity is ludicrous. English is a language of Norman knights trying to pick up Saxon barmaids (and all parties involved are fooling around with the Celts on the side because they have sexy syntax) that aggressively pursues other languages to beat them up for their stray vocabulary, and someone's prating on about a coinage having hybrid parentage? Get. Bloody. Real. ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT!


Also, anyone who finds this joke entertaining or worthwhile who also has ever used the so-called 'word' "compersion", which, in addition to sounding like a syndromic disease that is dismissed by the medical establishment as patient hysteria, has no fucking roots at all and is in fact lexical gibberish, needs to be taken out behind the barn and shot, twice, because there is no possible cure for that level of unmitigated damnfoolishness.

Comments

[wcg.livejournal.com]

Thank you. This is beautiful.

[duane-kc.livejournal.com]

I love the rant. Also the phrase "unmitigated damnfoolishness", which I must appropriate and spread about in all its glory.

[keshwyn]

Yes'm. I will not inflict that on you again - it was only funny the first time, anyway, and after that, it got old FAST.

[saoba.livejournal.com]

Oh my. *fans self* Rants wot make me laugh are alsways welcome.

ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT! made me giggle helplessly.

There are certain kinds of stupid to which the household response is meaningful eye contact and a murmurmed 'Double tap time' so I heartily second the taken out behind the barn sentiment.

[its-just-me.livejournal.com]

A rose by any other name IMO.

I'll just call it Bob

[cakmpls.livejournal.com]

This is particularly good: you can think it's cute, so long as you turn in your ipsomobile license and accept having your teleopticon privileges revoked. I find that when people vigorously object to something in the language, almost always they themselves use similar words or constructions frequently, without a second thought.

[tiger-spot.livejournal.com]

Glee!

[badseed1980.livejournal.com]

I want to start calling my boyfriend's car an ipsomobile now.

[kiya]

The other option is "autokinetikon", of course.

[coraline]

i <3 you :)

[kimberlogic.livejournal.com]

thank you, this is fantastic!

[badseed1980.livejournal.com]

Hmm. Both are equally awesome.

[intuition-ist.livejournal.com]

yup, this! as a wordsmith of some skill, i bow to your superior rantage. :>

[cos]

Something I've said often enough that I'd consider it a "stock rant" too, but I've never said it this entertainingly.

coslinked.

[ryanfirewitch.livejournal.com]

You. Are. Awesome.

This reminded me, I would love to figure out how to translate "Middle Egyptian, Motherfucker! Do you speak it?" to hieroglyphs.

[kiya]

Which of course reminds me of this post.

[necturus.livejournal.com]

Also, anyone who finds this joke entertaining or worthwhile who also has ever used the so-called 'word' "compersion", which, in addition to sounding like a syndromic disease that is dismissed by the medical establishment as patient hysteria, has no fucking roots at all and is in fact lexical gibberish, needs to be taken out behind the barn and shot, twice, because there is no possible cure for that level of unmitigated damnfoolishness.

That reminds me of an old song, one verse of whoch goes:

"Illigitimum non carborundum
Domine salvum fac
Illigitimum non carborundum
Domine salvum fac
Gaudeamus igitur
Veritas non sequitur
Illigitimum non carborundum
Ipso facto!"

Now *that* is lexical gibberish. "Carborundum" isn't even Latin.

And to your polyphilia and multiamory, I offer ta`addud al-ahbab ("multiplicity of beloveds").

[davidgoldfarb.livejournal.com]

You're quite right of course. I'll cop to having complained about mixing of Latin and Greek roots in the past; in a slight defense, I've never even heard the word "compersion" before this. What is it?

[lisaquestions.livejournal.com]

Beautiful rant.

I hate linguistic purists, primarily because they seem to be extremely selective as to which parts of the language they choose to make their battlefield.

[fierceawakening.livejournal.com]

I always wondered where the fuck "compersion" came from. "Com-" is recognizable, but I never could parse "persion."

[zombie-dog.livejournal.com]

I'm hoping that everybody here understands that the actual point of the joke is to hang a lampshade on the phrase 'polyamory is wrong', not to actually make a serious literary criticism.

Is it a bad joke? Oh sure. But there is a difference between 'entertaining' and 'worthwhile', and while the joke has little chance of being one, obviously it has been the other often enough that people make t-shirts of it.

Also, 'compersion' at least sounds a little better than 'frubbly', the UK term for it.

[kiya]

It supposedly means something like "feeling happy because my partner is happy with their other relationships". It has no discernable etymology, just a bunch of syllables thrown together by someone with no sense of euphony or language.

[kiya]

Someone's arse.

[linenoise.livejournal.com]

Okay, I giggled a bit throughout the rant. This comment here made me laugh uncontrollably. Thank you.

[kiya]

It's not so much a bad joke as one that turns around on the joker and makes them look catastrophically ignorant. Humorous linguistic pedantry to make a point works much better when one isn't displaying major linguistic ignorance; if nothing else, ignorance gives an easy route to miss the point by. And really, the joke is not even a funny-once for me; it's a funny-never, because it reflects so poorly on the person who makes it. (Some of that poor reflection is, admittedly, because I have never seen it outside a context of "Har har har look at me I'M SO CLEVAR", and have seen it every so often in that context for years. I'M SO CLEVAR people can easily exhaust the humor or effectiveness out of anything.)

On "compersion" vs. "frubbly", I would prefer to sound twee than like I'm suffering from a wasting illness, but on the whole I err on the side of using actual words. I find 'compersion' hideous in sound, even aside from the fact that it is apparently composed of a random collection of affixes.

On the lampshading thing, I am ... let's say I believe the majority of the commenters have reason to be personally acquainted with people shouting "polyamory is wrong" in their faces. Just because it's supposed to make a point doesn't mean it does it well.