Entry tags:
Stock Rants #2: "Polyamory" and word origins.
I was going to write up a bunch of these so I could just reference them later, and then I got distracted by a shiny object and just did the one. And then I was reminded last night, and this is the one that came out last night, so I am storing it.
Okay. I know that you think the "Polyamory is wrong! It should be 'multiamory' or 'polyphilia'! Mixing roots is wrong!" is cute. So here's the deal: you can think it's cute, so long as you turn in your ipsomobile license and accept having your teleopticon privileges revoked.
And maybe it's not "everything associated with a minority group has to go through an extra layer of justification" in its background, and I really need to grow a sense of humor or something (see userpicture), but frankly, the idea that suddenly my bastard whoreson of a language needs to practice stringent root purity is ludicrous. English is a language of Norman knights trying to pick up Saxon barmaids (and all parties involved are fooling around with the Celts on the side because they have sexy syntax) that aggressively pursues other languages to beat them up for their stray vocabulary, and someone's prating on about a coinage having hybrid parentage? Get. Bloody. Real. ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT!
Also, anyone who finds this joke entertaining or worthwhile who also has ever used the so-called 'word' "compersion", which, in addition to sounding like a syndromic disease that is dismissed by the medical establishment as patient hysteria, has no fucking roots at all and is in fact lexical gibberish, needs to be taken out behind the barn and shot, twice, because there is no possible cure for that level of unmitigated damnfoolishness.
Okay. I know that you think the "Polyamory is wrong! It should be 'multiamory' or 'polyphilia'! Mixing roots is wrong!" is cute. So here's the deal: you can think it's cute, so long as you turn in your ipsomobile license and accept having your teleopticon privileges revoked.
And maybe it's not "everything associated with a minority group has to go through an extra layer of justification" in its background, and I really need to grow a sense of humor or something (see userpicture), but frankly, the idea that suddenly my bastard whoreson of a language needs to practice stringent root purity is ludicrous. English is a language of Norman knights trying to pick up Saxon barmaids (and all parties involved are fooling around with the Celts on the side because they have sexy syntax) that aggressively pursues other languages to beat them up for their stray vocabulary, and someone's prating on about a coinage having hybrid parentage? Get. Bloody. Real. ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT!
Also, anyone who finds this joke entertaining or worthwhile who also has ever used the so-called 'word' "compersion", which, in addition to sounding like a syndromic disease that is dismissed by the medical establishment as patient hysteria, has no fucking roots at all and is in fact lexical gibberish, needs to be taken out behind the barn and shot, twice, because there is no possible cure for that level of unmitigated damnfoolishness.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT! made me giggle helplessly.
There are certain kinds of stupid to which the household response is meaningful eye contact and a murmurmed 'Double tap time' so I heartily second the taken out behind the barn sentiment.
no subject
I'll just call it Bob
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
coslinked.
no subject
This reminded me, I would love to figure out how to translate "Middle Egyptian, Motherfucker! Do you speak it?" to hieroglyphs.
no subject
no subject
That reminds me of an old song, one verse of whoch goes:
"Illigitimum non carborundum
Domine salvum fac
Illigitimum non carborundum
Domine salvum fac
Gaudeamus igitur
Veritas non sequitur
Illigitimum non carborundum
Ipso facto!"
Now *that* is lexical gibberish. "Carborundum" isn't even Latin.
And to your polyphilia and multiamory, I offer ta`addud al-ahbab ("multiplicity of beloveds").
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, one of the ugliest words ever and I avoid it like the plague.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I hate linguistic purists, primarily because they seem to be extremely selective as to which parts of the language they choose to make their battlefield.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
'aspersion' leads to the verb 'asperse' ("1. to attack with false, malicious, and damaging charges or insinuations; slander.
2. to sprinkle; bespatter.
Origin:
1480–90; < L aspersus besprinkled (ptp. of aspergere), equiv. to a- a- 5 + -sper- (comb. form of spar-, var. of sparg- sparge ) + -sus, var. of -tus ptp. suffix
Following those roots gives:
a- 5
var. of ad-, used: (1) before sc, sp, st (ascend) and (2) in words of French derivation (often with the sense of increase, addition): amass.
Origin:
ME, in some words < MF a- < L ad- prefix or ad prep. (see ad- ), as in abut; in others < L a- (var. of ad- ad- ), as in ascend
and
sparge
–verb (used with object), verb (used without object)
1. to scatter or sprinkle.
–noun
2. a sprinkling.
Origin:
1550–60; < L spargere to sprinkle, scatter
...
So... then on to the 'com' prefix:
a prefix meaning “with,” “together,” “in association,” and (with intensive force) “completely,” occurring in loanwords from Latin (commit): used in the formation of compound words before b, p, m: combine; compare; commingle.
Also, co-, col-, con-, cor-.
Origin:
< L, var. of prep. cum with
Put it all together and you get a word which SHOULD be 'comspersion', but I can accept that 'msp' is a bit unruly, and which means 'with sprinkling' or 'in association with spattering'... which sounds like some of both the better and the worse sex I've had, and like the group dynamics of too many poly situations I've seen and/or been in. ;)
no subject
no subject
(Someday, we must meet. People have been being shocked at me for ages that we don't already know each other.)
no subject
no subject
Is it a bad joke? Oh sure. But there is a difference between 'entertaining' and 'worthwhile', and while the joke has little chance of being one, obviously it has been the other often enough that people make t-shirts of it.
Also, 'compersion' at least sounds a little better than 'frubbly', the UK term for it.
no subject
On "compersion" vs. "frubbly", I would prefer to sound twee than like I'm suffering from a wasting illness, but on the whole I err on the side of using actual words. I find 'compersion' hideous in sound, even aside from the fact that it is apparently composed of a random collection of affixes.
On the lampshading thing, I am ... let's say I believe the majority of the commenters have reason to be personally acquainted with people shouting "polyamory is wrong" in their faces. Just because it's supposed to make a point doesn't mean it does it well.
no subject
Someone who cared about me and thought that what I'm doing is wrong wouldn't be putting it that way, they'd be saying things like "but what about
no subject
As for compersion/frubbly, I do think that the concept deserves a concise term and don't think that either one is particularly good. I don't much care for 'NRE' to describe the shinies that go along with a new relationship, either; I've largely been describing the glee I'm feeling about my new relationship with
no subject
"Shiny" is a good word. I honestly think that it's one of the better ones - unnecessary jargon is unnecessary.
no subject
Ah, I see you suffer from xkcd-386ism.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I just can't say it without feeling like I have a wattle.
no subject
no subject
I'm quite sure that wasn't *intended* as a reference to Lester Freamon (at the end of his rope) yelling that at a stonewalling witness in The Wire s2, but it made a funny rant even funnier imagining that it was. :)
(And "compersion" always squicks me, and I'm not entirely sure why. Perhaps because most of the people I've personally known who use that term are the "I like to watch hurr hurr derp derp" kind.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
This is an awesome post. You have made my morning.
no subject
no subject
James D. Nicoll, to meet the Piper quote.
no subject
no subject
I have loved the people who have screwed up the Nicoll quote, only to have it corrected, and then they tried to make excuses about who really wrote it, only to be directed at the author's blog.
no subject
Hey, we've got more than just syntax... Check out those verb forms!
no subject
no subject