I don't see that it's necessarily more dominant (heh) than, say, someone who is psychologically predisposed to take the submissive role, someone who wants to be struck in the first place, or someone who wants to do roleplay scenes. They all say _something_ about someone.
I can't personally justify putting in a separate axis for exhibitionism without putting in axes for d/s tendencies and traits, roleplaying tendencies, at a bare minimum, with strong consideration for s/m practices and bondage. Setting aside infantilism, excretory sexual practices, the sexual practices of furries and specific fetishisms. And, uh, all the stuff that I can't think of off the top of my head.
In any case, oneironaut and I are poking around the edges of assembling a code. Gtst is doing the sex and gender aspects, because gtst is the uebergendergeek. Eventually it'll get done, go into betatesting, and at some point wind up a comment in my livejournal. :}
Re: Oh, and another thought.
I can't personally justify putting in a separate axis for exhibitionism without putting in axes for d/s tendencies and traits, roleplaying tendencies, at a bare minimum, with strong consideration for s/m practices and bondage. Setting aside infantilism, excretory sexual practices, the sexual practices of furries and specific fetishisms. And, uh, all the stuff that I can't think of off the top of my head.
In any case,